No written verdict yet. Here is what commenters said.

10recommend
2warn against
Nov 21, 2025first mention
Sep 27, 2026latest mention
Nov 25 – Oct 26
Used forvoice agent sip/rtcvideo and audio callsreal-time video for servicereal-time videoreal-time voice avatarvideo conferencing

Why people recommend it

“LiveKit was a really nice foundation for video and audio calls.”

runs local chat server on Mac Studioon “Cloudflare Quick Tunnels”

“I also moved over to using livekit for the service, and man, I should've done that sooner.”

Show 3 more

“I also moved over to using livekit for the service, and man, I should've done that sooner.”

“the entire stack does indeed appear to be open source”

Caveats and dissent

“Livekit could at any time change their license and drop support for the free open-source version”

“LiveKit, the "open stack" they rely on ties into VC-funded US tech used for border surveillance”

Often compared with

Who recommends it in their own words

From the makers not counted in the ranking

“Our platform gives developers everything they need to build, test, deploy, scale, and observe agents in production.”

“LiveKit is building the infrastructure layer for the voice-driven era of computing.”

“LiveKit is building the infrastructure layer for the voice-driven era of computing.”

“LiveKit is building the infrastructure layer for the voice-driven era of computing.”

“Our platform gives developers everything they need to build, test, deploy, scale, and observe agents in production.”

“LiveKit is building the infrastructure layer for the voice-driven era of computing.”

All comments 31

“LiveKit was a really nice foundation for video and audio calls.”

runs local chat server on Mac Studioon “Cloudflare Quick Tunnels”

“I also moved over to using livekit for the service, and man, I should've done that sooner.”

“I also moved over to using livekit for the service, and man, I should've done that sooner.”

“I hope Livekit is good enough so solve that problem.”

“Proton Meet relies entirely on LiveKit Cloud (USA based)”

“Proton Meet relies entirely on LiveKit Cloud to run”

“For small groups SFU like Livekit is not needed at all.”

“We used LemonSlice, LiveKit, and ElevenLabs.”

Last week’s presentation on Docs, bloknotejs & Yjs https://fosdem.org/2026/schedule/event/DC97FQ-building_digital_workplace_solutions_on_top_of_foundational_libraries_blocknote_/

“Livekit could at any time change their license and drop support for the free open-source version”

we gotchu: https://docs.livekit.io/agents/models/tts/inference/inworld/

“the entire stack does indeed appear to be open source”

“LiveKit, the "open stack" they rely on ties into VC-funded US tech used for border surveillance”

“Here's the link to the LiveKit LemonSlice plugin.”

“a great open source (MIT licensed) product written in Go”

“speech to speech is not nearly as good as livekit IMO”

“Or PipeCat Cloud / LiveKit cloud”

“when we switched to OSS stacks (Pipecat, LiveKit), we realise that even with great OSS, the plumbing was still painful”

“livekit handles the webrtc video/audio (it’s been rock solid)”

“also recently added livekit and MAS for element call”

“Livekit + a few backend components hosted in Modal”

Threads where it came up

Data: livekit.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.

Keyboard shortcuts
j / kNext / previous item
o or EnterOpen selected item
/Search
g hHome
g tTop
g rRising
g cCategories
tToggle dark mode
?This help