Fewer than 5 people recommend it so far, so there's no written verdict. Here is what commenters said.

4recommend
1warn against
Jan 28, 2026first mention
Oct 24, 2026latest mention
Nov 25 – Oct 26
Used forfirmware / boot verificationevil maid protectionfirmware trust for laptopsmeasured boot firmwarefirmware boot environmentlaptop firmware

Why people recommend it

“There are very few machines that are capable of running Heads”

Show 3 more

“I use Heads with a hardware key to defend myself from an Evil Maid.”

“I layed down the tooling for anyone wanting to further protection”

“Heads is updated regularly: https://github.com/linuxboot/heads/”

Caveats and dissent

“I wouldn't call heads "best approach on what is available"”

Often compared with

From the makers not counted in the ranking

“This relates to work I've been doing with the [Heads](https://osresearch.net/) project.”

All comments 11

“There are very few machines that are capable of running Heads”

“I use Heads with a hardware key to defend myself from an Evil Maid.”

“I wouldn't call heads "best approach on what is available"”

“I layed down the tooling for anyone wanting to further protection”

“Heads is updated regularly: https://github.com/linuxboot/heads/”

“Heads + TPM is solid but I suspect it is not at the level of Google/Apple secure enclave.”

It replaces a proprietary component of your system with an open source one. Reading https://libreboot.org/#why-use-libreboot might provide further enlightenment.

“It works well with Qubes btw, and is recommended by the developers”

Threads where it came up

Data: heads.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.

Keyboard shortcuts
j / kNext / previous item
o or EnterOpen selected item
/Search
g hHome
g tTop
g rRising
g cCategories
tToggle dark mode
?This help