Fewer than 5 people recommend it so far, so there's no written verdict. Here is what commenters said.

3recommend
0warn against
Nov 7, 2025first mention
Aug 16, 2026latest mention
Nov 25 – Oct 26
Used forpasswords for bankingsimple password managementpassword management

Why people recommend it

“their system that handles custody of password manager secrets is designed to withstand even a compromise of their production infrastructure”

“the built-in Passwords/Google Password Manager are honestly hard to beat for simplicity”

Show 1 more

“what google + chrome + android does is pretty great imo”

Caveats and dissent

No one in these comments warned against it.

Often compared with

All comments 6

“I standardized on Google Password Manager, so use it for banking and stuff on many machines.”

“their system that handles custody of password manager secrets is designed to withstand even a compromise of their production infrastructure”

> I'm fairly sure a double-digit-level alphanumeric jumble is sufficient to be a password This isn't required either. Of course there's an xlcd for that: https://xkcd.com/936/ Besides, --- start quote --- Using complexity requirements (that is, where staff can only use passwords that are suitably complex) is a poor defence against guessing attacks. It places an extra burden on users, many of whom will use predictable

“the built-in Passwords/Google Password Manager are honestly hard to beat for simplicity”

“what google + chrome + android does is pretty great imo”

“I did save all of my past passwords in Google password already.”

Threads where it came up

Data: google-password-manager.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.

Keyboard shortcuts
j / kNext / previous item
o or EnterOpen selected item
/Search
g hHome
g tTop
g rRising
g cCategories
tToggle dark mode
?This help