Windows NT
No written verdict yet. Here is what commenters said.
9recommend
4warn against
Nov 23, 2025first mention
Oct 28, 2026latest mention
Why people recommend it
“realised what a huge jump it was compared to the dOS/Windows 3.x/Windows 9x lineage”
NT 5.0 beta tester, used NT through the ninetieson “LiberNT - A free NT operating system”
“NT had all the necessary facilities in the kernel”
Show 3 more
“switched to NT and never looked back”
switched from Windows 95on “Classic 7 is a Windows 10 LTSC mod to look 1:1 to Wi…”
“I don't recall the GUI ever actually hanging or crashing”
“Much easier to do, because of the superior, more modern architecture of Windows NT.”
Caveats and dissent
“was NT too heavy to run on contemporary consumer machines”
“NT not much better despite the fanbois saying otherwise”
Show 2 more
“The syscall numbers change with every release”
Often compared with
Who recommends it in their own words
Threads where it came up
- I Ported Mac OS X to the Nintendo Wii 2 mentions
- Moxnox 1.0: NT-Like, POSIX-Compatible OS Running Atop Btrfs 1 mention
- LiberNT - A free NT operating system 1 mention
- Windows 95 released August 24, 1995 1 mention
- RISC-V: They Should Have Known Better 1 mention
- Nvidia's Vera Whitepaper Has a Thread Loose 1 mention
Also written as Windows NT 4.0. Data: windows-nt.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.
All comments 22
Great article… but no mention of one of NT’s best features: completion ports! It ties together all the best features of the NT kernel and makes writing performant multi-threaded I/O applications (especially socket servers) a delight. The thread pool APIs introduced in Vista (which use completion ports under the hood) were also a sublime addition. https://pyparallel.org was possible to hack into existence over the cou
“realised what a huge jump it was compared to the dOS/Windows 3.x/Windows 9x lineage”
“was NT too heavy to run on contemporary consumer machines”
“Linux started about three years after NT did”
“PowerPC was an officially supported and shipping Windows NT 3.51 & 4 target”
“all of the released versions of NT on Alpha were 32 bit”
“NT not much better despite the fanbois saying otherwise”
“NT uses an object system for filesystem objects”
“NT had all the necessary facilities in the kernel”
“switched to NT and never looked back”
“NT was slow”
“I don't recall the GUI ever actually hanging or crashing”
“Much easier to do, because of the superior, more modern architecture of Windows NT.”
“There was a PPC version of Windows NT”
“The ideas behind the NT kernels are much deeper than what many Linux fans think of it”
“My favorite part of NT is the Local Procedure Call”
“NT was just so good”
“shipping software on Aix, HP-UX, Solaris and Windows NT/2000”
“The syscall numbers change with every release”
“Windows NT has excellent technical foundations”
“I didn't care that NT was more solid”
“I could have a browser open, PuTTY, and some tracker music playing no problem.”