wild
Fewer than 5 people recommend it so far, so there's no written verdict. Here is what commenters said.
4recommend
0warn against
Aug 26, 2026first mention
Oct 1, 2026latest mention
Why people recommend it
“Wild improves things significantly”
Show 1 more
“Wild is a decent bit faster than mold at this point”
Caveats and dissent
No one in these comments warned against it.
Often compared with
Threads where it came up
- How to speed up the Rust compiler in September 2026 2 mentions
- Mold: A Massively Parallel Linker 2 mentions
Also written as Wild. Data: wild.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.
All comments 4
(I did a quick test, and I'm seeing between 15-20% for https://github.com/servo/stylo which is a macro-heavy crate. I guess it only matter for crates you're actually editing though, macro will already be cached as part of "entire crate is unchanged") > Another thing that can easily improve performance is changing the global allocator, but I've seen teams that measured 10% perf improvements in their own metrics decide
“Wild improves things significantly”
“wild's model seems superior”
“Wild is a decent bit faster than mold at this point”