Fewer than 5 people recommend it so far, so there's no written verdict. Here is what commenters said.

3recommend
0warn against
Jan 22, 2026first mention
Aug 20, 2026latest mention
Nov 25 – Oct 26
Used fortext editingtext editorstructural regex editing

Why people recommend it

“Moved on to vis a few years ago and never looked back to vim/neovim.”

Show 3 more

“Vis editor [0] also has multicursor and powerful sam's structural regular expression”

“It was reasonably easy to make some complex edits in https://github.com/martanne/vis when I tried it”

Caveats and dissent

No one in these comments warned against it.

Often compared with

Who recommends it in their own words

All comments 5

“Moved on to vis a few years ago and never looked back to vim/neovim.”

“Vis editor [0] also has multicursor and powerful sam's structural regular expression”

“It was reasonably easy to make some complex edits in https://github.com/martanne/vis when I tried it”

Threads where it came up

Also written as Vis. Data: vis.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.

Keyboard shortcuts
j / kNext / previous item
o or EnterOpen selected item
/Search
g hHome
g tTop
g rRising
g cCategories
tToggle dark mode
?This help