Fewer than 5 people recommend it so far, so there's no written verdict. Here is what commenters said.

3recommend
0warn against
Jan 21, 2026first mention
Oct 23, 2026latest mention
Nov 25 – Oct 26
Used foropen-weight model inferencerunning open weight modelshosted open-weights modelsllm inference provideropenrouter alternativellm inference hosting

Why people recommend it

“the inference from together.ai feels like it might be better”

“Together.ai, Baseten, and others have already achieved higher throughput”

Show 1 more

“I’ve mostly settled on using a mixture of open weights models through Together.ai and Fireworks.ai”

Caveats and dissent

No one in these comments warned against it.

Often compared with

All comments 12

“the inference from together.ai feels like it might be better”

“Together.ai, Baseten, and others have already achieved higher throughput”

“I use something like together.ai with an open weight model like glm 5.3”

“I’ve mostly settled on using a mixture of open weights models through Together.ai and Fireworks.ai”

“using them as a downstream provider through openrouter at some point (IIRC).”

“Open-source model inference providers (who do not have to bear the cost of training) seem able to do it at much lower prices.”

“Together.ai is a good US provider but then it's 15X more expensive”

“the inference prices somewhere like Fireworks or TogetherAI charges is comparable to what Google/AWS/Azure charge for the same model”

“we get better performance than big players (588 tok/s vs. Together AI's 298”

“falls back to DeepSeek/Together”

Threads where it came up

Also written as together.ai, Together.ai. Data: together-ai.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.

Keyboard shortcuts
j / kNext / previous item
o or EnterOpen selected item
/Search
g hHome
g tTop
g rRising
g cCategories
tToggle dark mode
?This help