Fewer than 5 people recommend it so far, so there's no written verdict. Here is what commenters said.

2recommend
1warn against
Nov 10, 2025first mention
Oct 9, 2026latest mention
Nov 25 – Oct 26
Used fornas file sharingfile sharingnetwork file sharingfile sharing to macosmusic library file sharingself-hosted music library access

Why people recommend it

“have a Samba server that I can use to access my music library on the go if needed, via WireGuard. Honestly, I could not be more happier with it.”

“I use a Raspberry Pi 4 running Ubuntu and Samba as my NAS. It is cheap and reliable.”

Caveats and dissent

“I have been fighting annoying Samba issues with MacOS and a Linux NAS for years”

Often compared with

Who recommends it in their own words

All comments 10

“Samba server to access my things over the network”

“It's really not hard to setup LVM and Samba.”

“pass-through mount to an LXC that runs Samba”

“serving over samba and NFS”

“I keep my music library on a server with Samba installed”

“have a Samba server that I can use to access my music library on the go if needed, via WireGuard. Honestly, I could not be more happier with it.”

“I use Samba with all the safety catches switched off (on one side only) as a go between.”

consultant with a customer running DOS 6on “Windows 2 for the Apricot PC/Xi”

“I use a Raspberry Pi 4 running Ubuntu and Samba as my NAS. It is cheap and reliable.”

“I have been fighting annoying Samba issues with MacOS and a Linux NAS for years”

“I run openwrt, adguard, unbound, proxmox, jellyfin, samba, qbittorrent and syncthing”

Threads where it came up

Data: samba.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.

Keyboard shortcuts
j / kNext / previous item
o or EnterOpen selected item
/Search
g hHome
g tTop
g rRising
g cCategories
tToggle dark mode
?This help