rpm-ostree
Fewer than 5 people recommend it so far, so there's no written verdict. Here is what commenters said.
3recommend
2warn against
Nov 29, 2025first mention
Jul 14, 2026latest mention
Why people recommend it
“Yes, rpm-ostree solves that”
“it works pretty well in my experience”
Show 1 more
“With rpm-ostree automatic updates are so reliable it's a set and forget experience.”
Caveats and dissent
“rpm-ostree - same.”
“the tech is freaking buggy, annoying and deprecated already”
Often compared with
Threads where it came up
- Making Debian or Fedora persistent live images 2 mentions
- Everyone hates OneDrive, Microsofts cloud app that steals and deletes files 2 mentions
- Measuring Input Latency on Linux: X11 vs. Wayland, VRR, and DXVK 1 mention
- Mount Mayhem at Netflix: Scaling Containers on Modern CPUs 1 mention
- A Bug Is a Bug, but a Patch Is a Policy: The Case for Bootable Containers 1 mention
- I replaced Windows with Linux and everything's going great 1 mention
Data: rpm-ostree.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.
All comments 9
“Yes, rpm-ostree solves that”
rpm-ostree is being phased-out in favor of bootc[1], which uses ostree in the underlying code. 1. https://bootc.dev/bootc/
“It's great in the sense of 'I want a reliable and robust system', though it's awful in that”
“it works pretty well in my experience”
“rpm-ostree - same.”
“With rpm-ostree automatic updates are so reliable it's a set and forget experience.”
“bootc can by itself completely replace rpm-ostree”
“the tech is freaking buggy, annoying and deprecated already”
“rpm-ostree (which you really shouldn’t touch unless you absolutely have to)”