Qwen 3.7
Fewer than 5 people recommend it so far, so there's no written verdict. Here is what commenters said.
3recommend
0warn against
Jun 3, 2026first mention
Aug 16, 2026latest mention
Why people recommend it
“if I can clearly articulate a test suite or boilerplate refactoring it works fine.”
Hobby projects
“Please do yourself a favour and check out GLM-5.2, Qwen-3.7-Max, MiMo-2.5-Pro, and DeepSeek-V4-Pro.”
Show 2 more
“it's really much better than i expected (used to opus 4.7 at work)”
“use Qwen-3.7-Max for design/plan/architecture or difficult troubleshooting.”
leads a team of 3 developers, 1 designer, 1 non-technical useron “Kimi K2.7-Code: open-source coding model with better…”
Caveats and dissent
No one in these comments warned against it.
Often compared with
Who recommends it in their own words
Threads where it came up
- Kimi K2.7-Code: open-source coding model with better token efficiency 2 mentions
- Software Engineering fundamentals matter more 1 mention
- American AI is locked down and proprietary. It's losing 1 mention
- item 48622518 1 mention
- Anthropic to Require ID Verification for Certain Capabilities Starting July 8 1 mention
- Microsoft's MAI-Code-1-Flash Scores 51% SWE-Bench Pro with Just 5B Active Params 1 mention
Also written as Qwen 3.7, Qwen 3.7 Plus, Qwen3.7 Plus, Qwen 3.7 Max. Data: qwen-3-7.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.
All comments 7
“I'm mostly using Qwen3.6 (now Qwen3.7) running on my DGX Spark in llama.cpp”
“all 4 managed to produce correct functions all with the correct name.”
“if I can clearly articulate a test suite or boilerplate refactoring it works fine.”
“Please do yourself a favour and check out GLM-5.2, Qwen-3.7-Max, MiMo-2.5-Pro, and DeepSeek-V4-Pro.”
“it's really much better than i expected (used to opus 4.7 at work)”
“use Qwen-3.7-Max for design/plan/architecture or difficult troubleshooting.”
“switch between DeepSeek v4, GLM 5.1, and Qwen 3.7 models”