PRQL
Fewer than 5 people recommend it so far, so there's no written verdict. Here is what commenters said.
4recommend
0warn against
Nov 6, 2025first mention
Jun 4, 2026latest mention
Why people recommend it
“para-sql languages that can be useful, to lower the complexity”
“PRQL, or https://www.malloydata.dev/”
Show 3 more
“IMHO, PRQL is a reasonable approach to extending SQL without replacing SQL.”
“Malloy and PRQL (https://prql-lang.org/book/) are quite cool”
“https://prql-lang.org/ and compile to SQL.”
Caveats and dissent
No one in these comments warned against it.
Often compared with
Threads where it came up
Data: prql.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.
All comments 6
“para-sql languages that can be useful, to lower the complexity”
“PRQL, or https://www.malloydata.dev/”
“IMHO, PRQL is a reasonable approach to extending SQL without replacing SQL.”
“Malloy and PRQL (https://prql-lang.org/book/) are quite cool”
“https://prql-lang.org/ and compile to SQL.”
“It solves all the warts of sql while still being true to its declarative execution.”