Proxyman
No written verdict yet. Here is what commenters said.
8recommend
0warn against
Dec 19, 2025first mention
Apr 16, 2026latest mention
Why people recommend it
“switched to Proxyman and found it much better than Charles”
Show 3 more
“Proxyman makes this way nicer to work with and since switching I never faced certificate issues again.”
switched from Charles Proxyon “Charles Proxy”
Caveats and dissent
No one in these comments warned against it.
Often compared with
Who recommends it in their own words
Threads where it came up
Data: proxyman.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.
All comments 12
“closer to a MITM proxy like Proxyman than Wireshark”
“As Proxyman is really a good product, it seems they are going too much for the profit instead of what the users really needs”
I used Charles for many years but proxyman's performance is a real step up.
“A much better alternative for MacOS folks”
“definitely powerful and more modern, it honestly didn't feel”
“switched to Proxyman and found it much better than Charles”
“Proxyman makes this way nicer to work with and since switching I never faced certificate issues again.”
“https://proxyman.com/”
“It's a far better macOS app than Charles”
I used Charles for a while and also jumped on the Proxyman bandwagon. It’s a slick tool and even works for remote debugging (i.e., an iPhone attached to your computer with a cable).
“A few years ago I switched to https://proxyman.com and found it easier to use.”
“I’m on proxyman”