Processing
No written verdict yet. Here is what commenters said.
5recommend
2warn against
Mar 3, 2026first mention
Sep 25, 2026latest mention
Why people recommend it
“It reminds me of the little sketches I made with Processing[1] years ago”
“I love Processing and Perlin noise.”
Show 3 more
“Reading this makes me want to fire up Processing [1] again.”
“noob friendly stuff like Processing and Kaboom is great and highly recommended!”
Caveats and dissent
“I've tried Processing and Nodebox, and they haven't quite clicked”
“Processing lacks features like gradient fills that limit what's possible”
Often compared with
Who recommends it in their own words
Threads where it came up
- Generative Art over the Years 4 mentions
- Ink and Switch interactive homepage 1 mention
- Opus 5.5 is good at explainer videos 1 mention
- Toolcraft 1 mention
- Getting Creative with Perlin Noise Fields 1 mention
- item 48166744 1 mention
Data: processing.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.
All comments 11
“It reminds me of the little sketches I made with Processing[1] years ago”
“is open-source and uses Processing”
“feels like the design industry has forgotten about things like Processing.”
“I love Processing and Perlin noise.”
“I've tried Processing and Nodebox, and they haven't quite clicked”
“uses the Quil shim for the Processing GUI framework”
“It was great.”
“Processing lacks features like gradient fills that limit what's possible”
“Reading this makes me want to fire up Processing [1] again.”
“making generative art first using Processing, then p5.js”
“noob friendly stuff like Processing and Kaboom is great and highly recommended!”