Fewer than 5 people recommend it so far, so there's no written verdict. Here is what commenters said.

3recommend
0warn against
Feb 5, 2026first mention
Sep 19, 2026latest mention
Nov 25 – Oct 26
Used forbm25 search in postgrespostgres full-text searchpostgres full-text search in productionbm25 search index

Why people recommend it

“we have been using pg_textsearch in production for a few weeks now, and it's been fairly stable and super speedy”

Show 1 more

“with the recent example of pg_textsearch (BM25)”

Caveats and dissent

No one in these comments warned against it.

Often compared with

From the makers not counted in the ranking

“We have an alternative full-text search extension as well, pg_textsearch that's completely open source”

“you can use https://github.com/timescale/pg_textsearch on Azure HorizonDB”

“we've got pretty robust partitioned table support in the extension”

“pg_textsearch v1.0 is freely available via open source (Postgres license)”

database internals engineer at Tiger Data, 25 yearson “Show HN: How This Graybeard Built the Fastest and Fr…”

“We have docs on how to do hybrid search here”

“these two extensions make postgres a really capable hybrid search engine”

All comments 6

“https://timescale.github.io/pg_textsearch/benchmarks/comparison.html”

“we have been using pg_textsearch in production for a few weeks now, and it's been fairly stable and super speedy”

“with the recent example of pg_textsearch (BM25)”

“BM25 index for postgres, mostly written by a single (very smart) guy and Claude Code.”

Threads where it came up

Data: pg-textsearch.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.

Keyboard shortcuts
j / kNext / previous item
o or EnterOpen selected item
/Search
g hHome
g tTop
g rRising
g cCategories
tToggle dark mode
?This help