Perseus
Fewer than 5 people recommend it so far, so there's no written verdict. Here is what commenters said.
3recommend
0warn against
Jan 14, 2026first mention
Aug 8, 2026latest mention
Why people recommend it
“I'd be really surprised if people preferred it to Perseus”
“It looks good, lean and clean. The optional ontology is a nice surprise.”
Caveats and dissent
No one in these comments warned against it.
Threads where it came up
Data: perseus.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.
All comments 3
It follows that their tagging AI didn’t also learn by … at least taking the Perseus judgment into account? I assume the well marked ‘interlinear’ koinē NT texts online are coming from antecedent bible scholarship and the needs of eg ye olde Protestant bible colleges, and are nearly infallible (theological niceties aren’t likely to intrude! - but maybe I’m wrong) But NT is included in the corpus above, so I wonder if
“I'd be really surprised if people preferred it to Perseus”
“It looks good, lean and clean. The optional ontology is a nice surprise.”