Fewer than 5 people recommend it so far, so there's no written verdict. Here is what commenters said.

3recommend
3warn against
Feb 22, 2026first mention
Jul 24, 2026latest mention
Nov 25 – Oct 26
Used forjit compiler backendcompiler backend

Why people recommend it

“I recently switch to MIR”

“Started with the excellent MIR compiler”

Show 1 more

“Much more interesting is Mir”

Caveats and dissent

“I found IR much faster and better codegen than MIR”

“canonical with their Mir, snaps etc”

Often compared with

From the makers not counted in the ranking

“I work on Mir & Flutter”

“A long, long time ago I implemented virtual outputs in Mir”

All comments 7

“I recently switch to MIR”

“Started with the excellent MIR compiler”

“I found IR much faster and better codegen than MIR”

“QBE being a bit more friendly and well documented, with MIR making faster code”

“Much more interesting is Mir”

Ubuntu Touch... I was so excited about it that I bought one of the phones with it preloaded. I even used it as my sole daily driver for months, until I learned that I was not receiving all calls made to me. Even after that I kept hoping it would keep developing so that I could pick it up again one day. But then Canonical abandoned it instead. That's when they became as good as dead to me.

“canonical with their Mir, snaps etc”

Threads where it came up

Also written as MIR. Data: mir.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.

Keyboard shortcuts
j / kNext / previous item
o or EnterOpen selected item
/Search
g hHome
g tTop
g rRising
g cCategories
tToggle dark mode
?This help