Fewer than 5 people recommend it so far, so there's no written verdict. Here is what commenters said.

3recommend
4warn against
Dec 5, 2025first mention
Jun 9, 2026latest mention
Nov 25 – Oct 26
Used forbuilding windows programsbash on windows

Why people recommend it

“The reasons I use MinGW is because it produces better compatible binaries on Windows”

Show 2 more

“Now it's my little friend.”

“my programs work even on Windows 2000”

Caveats and dissent

“There are some pretty useful abstractions and libraries that MinGW doesn't work with.”

Show 2 more

“Clang is the better alternative to MinGW”

“It's usually code compiled with Mingw that gets AV false-positives in Nim.”

Often compared with

All comments 14

“if you have MinGW, this exact command-line invocation will probably work correctly”

“The reasons I use MinGW is because it produces better compatible binaries on Windows”

“we wouldn't probably need Mingw to build cross-platform apps”

“Now it's my little friend.”

“There are some pretty useful abstractions and libraries that MinGW doesn't work with.”

“my programs work even on Windows 2000”

“Clang is the better alternative to MinGW”

“Or you could install and old copy of Cygwin or MinGW.”

“I don't know if it's any better or worse than MinGW practically”

“It's usually code compiled with Mingw that gets AV false-positives in Nim.”

“The biggest issue I ran into was MinGW and GCC implement the FileSystem library differently”

“All I use is basically Firefox and a MinGW to have a bash”

Threads where it came up

Also written as Mingw. Data: mingw.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.

Keyboard shortcuts
j / kNext / previous item
o or EnterOpen selected item
/Search
g hHome
g tTop
g rRising
g cCategories
tToggle dark mode
?This help