LosslessCut
Fewer than 5 people recommend it so far, so there's no written verdict. Here is what commenters said.
4recommend
2warn against
Nov 12, 2025first mention
Jun 23, 2026latest mention
Why people recommend it
“Video editor: LosslessCut”
“then marking & batching with LossLessCut”
Show 2 more
“it's very practical when I don't want to reencode everything”
“I personally use lossless cut more than ffmpeg in the terminal”
Caveats and dissent
“its package size is absolutely massive”
“after years the results are mixed and only working for very specific codecs”
Often compared with
Threads where it came up
- item 47398916 2 mentions
- Ask HN: New clean macOS install. Must-have apps? Best browser? 1 mention
- Lazycut: A simple terminal video trimmer using FFmpeg 1 mention
- Show HN: Ez FFmpeg – Video editing in plain English 1 mention
- Yt-dlp: External JavaScript runtime now required for full YouTube support 1 mention
Data: losslesscut.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.
All comments 6
“Video editor: LosslessCut”
“then marking & batching with LossLessCut”
“its package size is absolutely massive”
“it's very practical when I don't want to reencode everything”
“I personally use lossless cut more than ffmpeg in the terminal”
“after years the results are mixed and only working for very specific codecs”