LINQ
No written verdict yet. Here is what commenters said.
5recommend
0warn against
Dec 22, 2025first mention
Jun 23, 2026latest mention
Why people recommend it
“Microsoft has been doing this for a long time”
“you can construct queries with a query builder API like C#'s LINQ”
Show 3 more
“It solves all of your issues with “ORMs””
“I much prefer systems like Linq or Kusto”
“LINQ rivals SQL itself”
Caveats and dissent
No one in these comments warned against it.
Often compared with
Threads where it came up
- Show HN: Bun-sqlgen – Type-safe raw SQL for Bun, no ORM 1 mention
- Code duplication is far cheaper than the wrong abstraction 1 mention
- SQLite Is a Library of Congress Recommended Storage Format 1 mention
- Java Is Fast. Your Code Might Not Be 1 mention
- Waiting for Postgres 19: Better Planner Hints with Path Generation Strategies [video] 1 mention
- The Rise of SQL:the second programming language everyone needs to know 1 mention
Data: linq.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.
All comments 6
“Microsoft has been doing this for a long time”
“I see C# has LINQ, which is a query languages embedded in the language”
“you can construct queries with a query builder API like C#'s LINQ”
“It solves all of your issues with “ORMs””
“I much prefer systems like Linq or Kusto”
“LINQ rivals SQL itself”