links
Fewer than 5 people recommend it so far, so there's no written verdict. Here is what commenters said.
1recommend
1warn against
Dec 10, 2025first mention
Aug 31, 2026latest mention
Why people recommend it
“One of the many reasons I prefer links (no graphics)”
daily text-only browser user for over three decadesswitched from lynxon “P99 0 ms* autocomplete for 240M domain names”
“links -dump \ https://assets.msn.com/content/view/v2/Detail/en-in/AA296NRC”
Show 1 more
“Or use a text-only browser”
Caveats and dissent
“way better than the crusty old lynx and links on sites that need JS”
Often compared with
Who recommends it in their own words
Threads where it came up
- P99 0 ms* autocomplete for 240M domain names 1 mention
- Situational Awareness Down 67% in July in AI Stock Rout 1 mention
- Why is Apple asking me to pay more for Big Tech's AI obsession? 1 mention
- The Small-Business Owners Managing Whole Armies of A.I. Employees 1 mention
- Squillions – two books about money-laundering 1 mention
- Lightpanda migrate DOM implementation to Zig 1 mention
Data: links.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.
All comments 7
“One of the many reasons I prefer links (no graphics)”
“links -dump \ https://assets.msn.com/content/view/v2/Detail/en-in/AA296NRC”
“links -dump 1.htm”
“links -source $(tmux capture -t0 -p --|tail -1)”
“Or use a text-only browser”
“way better than the crusty old lynx and links on sites that need JS”
“links -dump 1.htm”