Fewer than 5 people recommend it so far, so there's no written verdict. Here is what commenters said.

4recommend
1warn against
Nov 20, 2025first mention
Oct 30, 2026latest mention
Nov 25 – Oct 26
Used forself-hosted git serverself-hosted tangled git serverauthoritative dns with dnssecauthoritative dns

Why people recommend it

“Being able to host my git repos as a headless, data-only server is about as painless as self-hosting can get.”

Show 2 more

“The fact you can always switch to a self-hosted knot is nice”

“With Knot, you can just add ~8 lines to your config”

Caveats and dissent

“it only really reliably worked once I enabled lots of IPv4 NAT'ing”

Often compared with

Who recommends it in their own words

All comments 7

“it only really reliably worked once I enabled lots of IPv4 NAT'ing”

“Being able to host my git repos as a headless, data-only server is about as painless as self-hosting can get.”

“sidecar services like knot can use service authentication”

“The fact you can always switch to a self-hosted knot is nice”

“With Knot, you can just add ~8 lines to your config”

“a fastmail blog about why they switched to knot (from PowerDNS)”

Threads where it came up

Also written as Knot DNS, knot. Data: knot.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.

Keyboard shortcuts
j / kNext / previous item
o or EnterOpen selected item
/Search
g hHome
g tTop
g rRising
g cCategories
tToggle dark mode
?This help