Fewer than 5 people recommend it so far, so there's no written verdict. Here is what commenters said.

4recommend
0warn against
Jan 8, 2026first mention
Jul 14, 2026latest mention
Nov 25 – Oct 26
Used forphysics simulationphysics engine for netcode3d physics enginegame physics engine

Why people recommend it

“I'm a big fan of jolt because they have a more incremental way of snapshotting physics state”

“there is a WASM build with full feature support”

Show 2 more

“i love that we went from bullet being the only real option for open source 3D physics to jolt, rapier, avian, nvidia physx and now box3d.”

“which is really rather wonderful and inspiring to see”

Caveats and dissent

No one in these comments warned against it.

Who recommends it in their own words

All comments 5

“The techs: Rust, raylib, JoltPhysics.”

building a wood-working simulator gameon “Ask HN: What Are You Working On? (July 2026)”

“I'm a big fan of jolt because they have a more incremental way of snapshotting physics state”

“there is a WASM build with full feature support”

“i love that we went from bullet being the only real option for open source 3D physics to jolt, rapier, avian, nvidia physx and now box3d.”

“which is really rather wonderful and inspiring to see”

Threads where it came up

Also written as JoltPhysics. Data: jolt-physics.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.

Keyboard shortcuts
j / kNext / previous item
o or EnterOpen selected item
/Search
g hHome
g tTop
g rRising
g cCategories
tToggle dark mode
?This help