Inferno
Fewer than 5 people recommend it so far, so there's no written verdict. Here is what commenters said.
3recommend
0warn against
Nov 11, 2025first mention
Oct 23, 2026latest mention
Why people recommend it
“Maybe inferno with proper namespaces”
“I can't understate how cool the Inferno system is.”
Show 1 more
Caveats and dissent
No one in these comments warned against it.
From the makers not counted in the ranking
“co-developing an open-source Apple Silicon emulator”
“co-developing an open-source Apple Silicon emulator”
“co-developing an open-source Apple Silicon emulator”
“co-developing an open-source Apple Silicon emulator”
“co-developing an open-source Apple Silicon emulator”
“co-developing an open-source Apple Silicon emulator”
Threads where it came up
- Writing your own BEAM 2 mentions
- Run full iOS 16.5 firmware on Android Devices 1 mention
- Will Linux phones become a viable alternative to the Android/iOS duopoly? 1 mention
- Ask HN: Who wants to be hired? (October 2026) 1 mention
- Ask HN: Who wants to be hired? (August 2026) 1 mention
- Ask HN: Who wants to be hired? (July 2026) 1 mention
Data: inferno.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.
All comments 5
“I think it continues as Chefkiss inferno and they seem to be close to getting recent iOS to work”
“In Inferno, only the kernel, DisVM (+ JIT), and a few drivers are still C, everything else in userspace is Limbo.”
“Maybe inferno with proper namespaces”
“I can't understate how cool the Inferno system is.”
“To me its a great design”