Fewer than 5 people recommend it so far, so there's no written verdict. Here is what commenters said.

3recommend
1warn against
Dec 6, 2025first mention
Sep 10, 2026latest mention
Nov 25 – Oct 26
Used forhigh-throughput ssh

Why people recommend it

“Step one, run https://www.psc.edu/hpn-ssh-home/introduction/ instead”

“Maybe that will be useful for thinking about workarounds or maybe you can just use hpn-ssh.”

Show 1 more
r1chDec 6, 2025recommends

“HPN-SSH[1] resolves this but isn't widely deployed.”

Caveats and dissent

“I'm not so sure about running an ssh fork on important systems.”

Often compared with

All comments 7

“I'm not so sure about running an ssh fork on important systems.”

“Step one, run https://www.psc.edu/hpn-ssh-home/introduction/ instead”

“Maybe that will be useful for thinking about workarounds or maybe you can just use hpn-ssh.”

Yeah, my naive implementation thought experiment was oriented towards a side channel brokered by the ssh connection using nginx and curl. Something like source opens nginx to share a file and tells sink via ssh to curl the file from source with a particular cert. However, I observed that curl [0] uses openssl' quic implementation (for one of its experimental implementations). Another backend for curl is Quiche [1] wh

“the patch that "makes" it HPN-SSH is already present upstream”

r1chDec 6, 2025recommends

“HPN-SSH[1] resolves this but isn't widely deployed.”

Threads where it came up

Also written as hpn-ssh. Data: hpn-ssh.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.

Keyboard shortcuts
j / kNext / previous item
o or EnterOpen selected item
/Search
g hHome
g tTop
g rRising
g cCategories
tToggle dark mode
?This help