Hanami
Fewer than 5 people recommend it so far, so there's no written verdict. Here is what commenters said.
4recommend
0warn against
Nov 8, 2025first mention
Jul 10, 2026latest mention
Why people recommend it
“i'm glad it's built from little composable gems (unlike rails)”
new to Rubyon “Hanami 3.0: In Full Bloom”
Show 3 more
“I found Hanami (then called Lotus) shortly after and I never looked back.”
“Hanami remains a bright spark as an alternative growing Ruby app framework to Rails.”
“I use other Ruby frameworks like Bridgetown, Roda, and Hanami”
switched from Railson “Friendly attributes pattern in Ruby”
Caveats and dissent
No one in these comments warned against it.
Often compared with
Who recommends it in their own words
From the makers not counted in the ranking
“our view layer (and assets layer) is very flexible”
Threads where it came up
- Hanami 3.0: In Full Bloom 7 mentions
- How to Start a Ruby Meetup 1 mention
- Mruby: Ruby for Embedded Systems 1 mention
- Friendly attributes pattern in Ruby 1 mention
Data: hanami.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.
All comments 7
“Hanami is decent.”
“i'm glad it's built from little composable gems (unlike rails)”
“they show approximate parity, with Hanami being slightly faster”
“I found Hanami (then called Lotus) shortly after and I never looked back.”
“the Hanakai ecosystem looks really, really interesting”
“Hanami remains a bright spark as an alternative growing Ruby app framework to Rails.”
“I use other Ruby frameworks like Bridgetown, Roda, and Hanami”