Google AI Overviews
No written verdict yet. Here is what commenters said.
5recommend
20warn against
Dec 8, 2025first mention
Oct 30, 2026latest mention
Why people recommend it
“I use that google AI overview a lot”
“Google already has AI overviews which I use instead of polluting my ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini chats.”
Show 3 more
“As a user: I love it!”
“recently its like a switch flipped and im finding them actually useful.”
“Google's AI overviews are pretty much the only way that I use AI.”
Caveats and dissent
“But it’s so unreliable.”
Show 2 more
“Google now gives me an AI-generated answer that is wrong as often as not.”
“It's a whole meme category to make the AI overview help with absurd scenarios”
Often compared with
Threads where it came up
- When did Google get so weird? 3 mentions
- Search engines alternatives now that Google isn't Google anymore 3 mentions
- OpenAI's cash burn will be one of the big bubble questions of 2026 2 mentions
- The "confident idiot" problem: Why AI needs hard rules, not vibe checks 2 mentions
- Google Search is now less than half of Alphabet’s revenue 1 mention
- Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent 1 mention
Also written as Google AI Overview. Data: google-ai-overviews.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.
All comments 28
“But it’s so unreliable.”
“Google's AI is really intrusive.”
“Google now gives me an AI-generated answer that is wrong as often as not.”
“It's a whole meme category to make the AI overview help with absurd scenarios”
“I use that google AI overview a lot”
“Google already has AI overviews which I use instead of polluting my ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini chats.”
https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/google-steals-even-deleted-data/175522 I can prove that my posts were deleted 3–4 hours earlier, and I can also prove that afterwards Google’s AI Overview still found them cached. This puts Google in a very bad legal position, because the system logs and the Wayback snapshot together show that they stored and processed deleted data without any lawful basis. In this post you can find th
“LLMs and AI overviews are wrecking me”
“Google's AI overviews had falsely tied two publishing companies to scams”
“Google just lost a lawsuit for citing sources and then displaying information that didn't occur in the sources.”
“it's not typically (anywhere near as) high as it would have been”
“If your fundamental problem is the accuracy of ai overview I’m with you.”
“My problem with the AI Overview feature is that it provides what you're looking for at the expense of everyone who provided the data”
“As a user: I love it!”
“Google reply is: "Yes, BlueCruise is available for the Ford Bronco!”
“the AI overview is definitely worse”
For defamatory statements about public figures, "actual malice" is a necessary component of defamation. For private individuals, plaintiffs just have to prove "negligence", that Google didn't act with reasonable care before publishing. It's unclear whether courts would find negligence, but a decent lawyer would argue something like: "By explicitly stating in their disclaimer that Google knows some of the information
“The google overview had the decimal spot in the wrong place.... confusing a lethal amount for a trivial amount.”
“recently its like a switch flipped and im finding them actually useful.”
“for Google AI Overview (not sure which Gemini model is used for it”
“AI Overview: Based on the research,”
“regular Google's "AI overviews" which are still mostly trash”
“AI overviews only handles (rather poorly in my opinion) a small, limited part”
“Google's AI overviews are pretty much the only way that I use AI.”
“Google’s AI answer confidently starts with the word “Yes”, but fails to back it up with scientific references.”
“Ai overview: my page impressions were high, my ranking was high, but click through took a dive.”
“I find myself skipping the AI overview like I used to skip over "Sponsored" results”
“You might notice that the AI overview got the link, the date, the title, the appearing characters, the theme, and the dialog wrong.”