Glamorous Toolkit
Fewer than 5 people recommend it so far, so there's no written verdict. Here is what commenters said.
3recommend
0warn against
Jan 1, 2026first mention
Oct 26, 2026latest mention
Why people recommend it
“It was a pretty good experience and the built-in data exploration was top notch.”
“Glamorous Toolkit is the main one I have found”
Show 1 more
“both Glamorous Toolkit and plain Pharo have tooling that allows integration of both local and remote LLM services”
Caveats and dissent
No one in these comments warned against it.
Threads where it came up
- Inventing the Future, One Lisp Machine at a Time 2 mentions
- Pharo 14 1 mention
- Squeak/Smalltalk 6.1 Release Notes 1 mention
- Malleable Computing, Emacs, and You 1 mention
- Hoot: Scheme on WebAssembly 1 mention
- Easel Turns One One year of building my own IDE in Clojure 1 mention
Data: glamorous-toolkit.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.
All comments 7
“It was a pretty good experience and the built-in data exploration was top notch.”
“How does this compare to Glamorous Toolkit[1]?”
“it'll take ages before GT Coder gets those features.”
“Glamorous Toolkit is the main one I have found”
“I also think that Glamorous Toolkit (https://gtoolkit.com/) might be a similar live environment”
“both Glamorous Toolkit and plain Pharo have tooling that allows integration of both local and remote LLM services”
“makes very different trade-offs than Easel”