Fewer than 5 people recommend it so far, so there's no written verdict. Here is what commenters said.

3recommend
2warn against
Jan 22, 2026first mention
Mar 18, 2026latest mention
Nov 25 – Oct 26
Used forspec-driven ai developmentteam hackathon spec-driven developmentspec-driven development with claudevibe coding workflowphased planning and execution workflowstructured claude code workflow

Why people recommend it

“But I would recommend it to non coders trying to code.”

“I have been using this a lot lately and ... it's good.”

Show 1 more

“the reliability and almost absence of any error is amazing”

Caveats and dissent

“For what we were trying to build - few small sets of features - using gsd was an overkill.”

Often compared with

Who recommends it in their own words

All comments 6

“But I would recommend it to non coders trying to code.”

“For what we were trying to build - few small sets of features - using gsd was an overkill.”

“I have been using this a lot lately and ... it's good.”

“I hit a wall trying to integrate open-code with the get-shit-done (gsd) workflow.”

“the reliability and almost absence of any error is amazing”

Threads where it came up

Also written as get-shit-done. Data: get-shit-done.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.

Keyboard shortcuts
j / kNext / previous item
o or EnterOpen selected item
/Search
g hHome
g tTop
g rRising
g cCategories
tToggle dark mode
?This help