DR-DOS
No written verdict yet. Here is what commenters said.
5recommend
0warn against
Nov 3, 2025first mention
Aug 3, 2026latest mention
Why people recommend it
“DR leapfrogged with DR-DOS 5: all that, but smaller, with built-in memory management.”
“until I switched to DR DOS 5”
switched from MS-DOS 4on “What Happened to Gem?”
Show 3 more
“I was a DR-DOS 6.0 user and it was great, 7.0 seemed to be worse.”
“For a while it had more features and ran better than MS-DOS.”
Caveats and dissent
No one in these comments warned against it.
Threads where it came up
- What Happened to Gem? 2 mentions
- CP/M-386 – CP/M for 386 protected mode, derived from CP/M‑68K 1 mention
- The Official DR DOS Website 1 mention
- DOS Memory Management 1 mention
- SvarDOS – an open-source DOS distribution 1 mention
- Writing FreeDOS Programs in C 1 mention
Also written as DR DOS. Data: dr-dos.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.
All comments 7
“DR leapfrogged with DR-DOS 5: all that, but smaller, with built-in memory management.”
“until I switched to DR DOS 5”
“DR-DOS was more than alright”
“I was a DR-DOS 6.0 user and it was great, 7.0 seemed to be worse.”
“He was running Dr -dos”
“For a while it had more features and ran better than MS-DOS.”
“Back in the 20th century I used DR-DOS”