No written verdict yet. Here is what commenters said.

5recommend
1warn against
Aug 21, 2026first mention
Oct 22, 2026latest mention
Nov 25 – Oct 26
Used formonitoring communicationsread-heavy long-horizon tasks, making prsalways-on agents

Why people recommend it

“Dots is the better product overall right now.”

“I used dots and enjoyed it because I could supplement my codex usage”

Show 3 more

“the only reason why I haven't switched from instinct to dots”

switched from instincton “Claude Duet”

“There's a lot of negativity in here for Dots.”

“Does https://usedots.com/ fit your purpose?”

Caveats and dissent

“Sorry, but all the evidence I've seen points to their models being nowhere near good enough to do this reliably, consistently and responsibly.”

Often compared with

All comments 8

“Dots is the better product overall right now.”

“I used dots and enjoyed it because I could supplement my codex usage”

“the only reason why I haven't switched from instinct to dots”

switched from instincton “Claude Duet”

“Sorry, but all the evidence I've seen points to their models being nowhere near good enough to do this reliably, consistently and responsibly.”

“There's a lot of negativity in here for Dots.”

“Dots are not remote agents _in_ a sandbox.”

“Does https://usedots.com/ fit your purpose?”

“How do you compare to https://usedots.com/?”

Threads where it came up

Also written as dots. Data: dots.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.

Keyboard shortcuts
j / kNext / previous item
o or EnterOpen selected item
/Search
g hHome
g tTop
g rRising
g cCategories
tToggle dark mode
?This help