django-tasks
Fewer than 5 people recommend it so far, so there's no written verdict. Here is what commenters said.
4recommend
0warn against
Nov 28, 2025first mention
Feb 2, 2026latest mention
Why people recommend it
“With django-tasks and a few extra packages you can already get quite far”
“Adam Johnson mentioned django-tasks as the reference implementation that may be included in Django”
Show 2 more
“Background workers are nearly there now, django-tasks has been partially merged into core Django in 6.0”
“That and the rq backend sound promising to me.”
Caveats and dissent
No one in these comments warned against it.
Often compared with
Threads where it came up
- Oban, the job processing framework from Elixir, has come to Python 2 mentions
- Django 6 2 mentions
- Oban Comes to Python 1 mention
- I Love You, Redis, but I'm Leaving You for SolidQueue 1 mention
- Django: what’s new in 6.0 1 mention
- A first look at Django's new background tasks 1 mention
Also written as Django Tasks. Data: django-tasks.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.
All comments 8
“considering using django-tasks with an rq backend”
“Can we use it with the Django Task Framework?”
“are there any plans for interop between Oban and the new Django Tasks”
“With django-tasks and a few extra packages you can already get quite far”
“to use Tasks in production right now you need to use this as well”
“Adam Johnson mentioned django-tasks as the reference implementation that may be included in Django”
“Background workers are nearly there now, django-tasks has been partially merged into core Django in 6.0”
“That and the rq backend sound promising to me.”