Devstral 2
Fewer than 5 people recommend it so far, so there's no written verdict. Here is what commenters said.
4recommend
1warn against
Dec 9, 2025first mention
May 29, 2026latest mention
Why people recommend it
“a dense model like Devstral2 24B slaps on the Dual GPU setup”
“I use Devstral 2 and Gemini 3 daily.”
Show 2 more
“A competitive coding like devstral 2 runs fast enough to be very helpful”
Caveats and dissent
“doesn't look particularly permissively licensed (or open-source)”
Often compared with
Threads where it came up
- Mistral releases Devstral2 and Mistral Vibe CLI 5 mentions
- Notes from the Mistral AI Now Summit in Paris 1 mention
- Mistral Medium 3.5 1 mention
- France's Mistral Built a $14B AI Empire by Not Being American 1 mention
- Claude Opus 4.7 1 mention
- Things I Think I Think... Preferring Local OSS LLMs 1 mention
Data: devstral-2.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.
All comments 14
“they’re retiring some (most?) of the dedicated models like devstral gradually through August”
“The Devstral 2 model even looks slightly better”
“not limits for devstral-2”
“Claude is far better in such a "benchmark" than e.g. Devstral2.”
“a dense model like Devstral2 24B slaps on the Dual GPU setup”
“devstral-2512 devstral-latest and devstral-medium-latest are all devstral 2”
“I use Devstral 2 and Gemini 3 daily.”
“A competitive coding like devstral 2 runs fast enough to be very helpful”
“Devstral 2 should be above”
“I used Mistral's own API models for this.”
>"Open Source" is nebulous No it isn't it is well defined. The only people who find it "nebulous" are people who want the benefits without upholding the obligations. https://opensource.org/definition-annotated
“but can it recreate the spacejam 1996 website?”
“llm -m mistral/devstral-2512”
“doesn't look particularly permissively licensed (or open-source)”