No written verdict yet. Here is what commenters said.

6recommend
2warn against
Nov 1, 2025first mention
Oct 25, 2026latest mention
Nov 25 – Oct 26
Used forocrimage-of-text models

Why people recommend it

“check out PEXEL and DeepSeek-OCR.”

“Deepseek was the first to really jump on this”

Show 3 more

“What makes the DeepSeek-OCR and related results exciting to some researchers”

“DeepSeek-OCR proved 10x+ compression from visual embedding of text”

“I love that the entire goal is to push Deepseek OCR further.”

Caveats and dissent

“PaddleOCR, dots.ocr and DeepSeek OCR performed significantly worse”

“Deepseek OCR is no longer state of the art.”

Often compared with

All comments 9

“check out PEXEL and DeepSeek-OCR.”

“PaddleOCR, dots.ocr and DeepSeek OCR performed significantly worse”

“Deepseek was the first to really jump on this”

“What makes the DeepSeek-OCR and related results exciting to some researchers”

“DeepSeek-OCR proved 10x+ compression from visual embedding of text”

“I love that the entire goal is to push Deepseek OCR further.”

“Deepseek OCR is no longer state of the art.”

“images can be profoundly more token-efficient encodings of information than even CSVs”

Threads where it came up

Also written as DeepSeek OCR. Data: deepseek-ocr.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.

Keyboard shortcuts
j / kNext / previous item
o or EnterOpen selected item
/Search
g hHome
g tTop
g rRising
g cCategories
tToggle dark mode
?This help