Collapse OS
Fewer than 5 people recommend it so far, so there's no written verdict. Here is what commenters said.
4recommend
0warn against
Nov 8, 2025first mention
Aug 11, 2026latest mention
Why people recommend it
“You should look into https://collapseos.org/ along those lines.”
“Dusk/Collapse OS does what it says on the tin”
Show 2 more
“Congratulations, welcome to the dev team of Collapse OS.”
“An interesting project chose it as its lang”
Caveats and dissent
No one in these comments warned against it.
Threads where it came up
- Building a 2.5kWh battery from disposable vapes to power my workshop [video] 2 mentions
- The UK's War on Anonymity Has Come to America 1 mention
- Permacomputing Principles 1 mention
- Permacomputing 1 mention
- Forth – Is it still relevant? 1 mention
Also written as CollapseOS. Data: collapse-os.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.
All comments 6
“You should look into https://collapseos.org/ along those lines.”
“Dusk/Collapse OS does what it says on the tin”
Your reasoning is sound, but is already covered by Collapse OS' manifesto. It refers to two stages of collapse, Collapse OS being for the second. As long as we have working modern machines, self-contained modern open source OSes, NetBSD being one, are good choices. One problem there is with such system is their overall complexity. Sure, you can use them, and they're pretty flexible for the user. However, when necessi
“My first time seeing Collapse OS as well”
“Congratulations, welcome to the dev team of Collapse OS.”
“An interesting project chose it as its lang”