ChatGPT Pro
No written verdict yet. Here is what commenters said.
Why people recommend it
“it will research Pubmed etc and give you a careful measured answer”
Show 3 more
“My nontechnical partner likes to talk to ChatGPT 5.5 Pro for image related tasks”
“I'd only bother with ChatGPT Pro.”
“examples like the following will become common place”
Caveats and dissent
“ChatGPT 6 Pro and Opus 5.5 have struggled to make any sense”
“you can't just remove half the usage for PRO200”
Show 2 more
“this subscription will lose half of its value and then I'll have to pay 2.5x as much to get 1.25x the value”
“for the price of two months of ChatGPT Pro and never bother”
Often compared with
Who recommends it in their own words
Threads where it came up
- ChatGPT Pro 500 3 mentions
- Gemini 4 Argon 1 mention
- Study: Young users (9 to 18Y) ditch Google for AI, with unknown consequences 1 mention
- Stealing Reasoning Traces from Proprietary LLM APIs 1 mention
- GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra will be in Codex 1 mention
- AI's Affordability Crisis 1 mention
Also written as ChatGPT 5.5 Pro, ChatGPT 5.2 Pro, ChatGPT 6 Pro. Data: chatgpt-pro.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.
All comments 20
“ChatGPT 6 Pro and Opus 5.5 have struggled to make any sense”
“you can't just remove half the usage for PRO200”
“Easily pays for itself in that regard.”
“this subscription will lose half of its value and then I'll have to pay 2.5x as much to get 1.25x the value”
“it will research Pubmed etc and give you a careful measured answer”
“I ask a question from ChatGPT pro, once it is done”
“have been using chatgpt pro from codex cli for months now”
“My nontechnical partner likes to talk to ChatGPT 5.5 Pro for image related tasks”
“I'd only bother with ChatGPT Pro.”
“examples like the following will become common place”
Tangent: this is one of those situations where slang is harmful to understanding. When I saw "will absolutely destroy" my first interpretation was a positive connotation. Of course further context made it clear you were being straightforward, and this isn't aimed at you. Along these lines, "drop" has become a problematic term: "Acme co dropped support for Foo" means it's EOL, but "Foo dropped today" implies it just l
“use ChatGPT 5.5 pro to plan a feature and generate an implementation plan”
“Awesome news.”
“for the price of two months of ChatGPT Pro and never bother”
“A pretty reasonable answer by ChatGPT, althought it did take 2min4s to answer”
“ChatGPT 5.2 Pro only allows 60k tokens, so I have no choice sometimes.”
“compared it directly with Claude Max x20”
“I just learned ChatGPT 5.2 Pro is $168/1mtok. Insanity.”
“ChatGPT seems to have gone down the 'nerfing' road where it now flat out refuses to do what I ask it to do quite often.”
“ChatGPT Pro mode is helpful, but it's too slow”