Fewer than 5 people recommend it so far, so there's no written verdict. Here is what commenters said.

3recommend
0warn against
Dec 15, 2025first mention
Jan 13, 2026latest mention
Nov 25 – Oct 26
Used forterminal image display without sixelterminal graphicsterminal graphics fallback

Why people recommend it

“You could also take a look at chafa[0] for supporting terminals without sixel.”

“I use chafa in term.everything[0], and I have nothing but good things to say about it!”

Show 1 more

“I use chafa extensively, and it really is the best tool for terminal graphics in my opinion.”

Caveats and dissent

No one in these comments warned against it.

All comments 3

“You could also take a look at chafa[0] for supporting terminals without sixel.”

“I use chafa in term.everything[0], and I have nothing but good things to say about it!”

“I use chafa extensively, and it really is the best tool for terminal graphics in my opinion.”

Threads where it came up

Also written as chafa. Data: chafa.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.

Keyboard shortcuts
j / kNext / previous item
o or EnterOpen selected item
/Search
g hHome
g tTop
g rRising
g cCategories
tToggle dark mode
?This help