Apache Iggy
Fewer than 5 people recommend it so far, so there's no written verdict. Here is what commenters said.
3recommend
0warn against
Dec 4, 2025first mention
Oct 26, 2026latest mention
Why people recommend it
“I wonder if you guys are using or have considered using Apache Iggy over there”
“Apache Iggy seems like a project with a lot of momentum”
Show 1 more
“Never tried it, but looks promising”
Caveats and dissent
No one in these comments warned against it.
Often compared with
From the makers not counted in the ranking
“There's an open PR to implement sink + source for MQTT”
“we simply build all this stuff from the ground up to make the most out of modern hardware”
“Sans-IO is for clients only, and we'd like to introduce it one day to SDK”
Threads where it came up
- Apache Iggy, a message streaming platform in Rust, graduates to an Apache TLP 2 mentions
- Why is it so expensive to send an email? 1 mention
- Show HN: Gobble – Yet Another OSS Alternative to Google Analytics/PostHog, etc. 1 mention
- Vibes – Remote session control, observability and persistent context 1 mention
- IBM to acquire Confluent 1 mention
- Show HN: Walrus – a Kafka alternative written in Rust 1 mention
Also written as Iggy. Data: apache-iggy.json. Quotes are verbatim; the verdict and theme labels are written by a model from these comments, and every clause links to its sources.
All comments 5
“I wonder if you guys are using or have considered using Apache Iggy over there”
“Stack is Iggy, Polars, Datafusion, RisingWave, R2, CF Workers, Civo”
“It uses Iggy as the message streaming layer”
“Apache Iggy seems like a project with a lot of momentum”
“Never tried it, but looks promising”