{"slug": "warpbuild", "name": "WarpBuild", "category": "infra", "category_name": "Infrastructure and DevOps", "description": "", "recommenders": 4, "commenters": 5, "warners": 1, "score": 2.865, "rising": 0.02, "first": "2025-12-16", "latest": "2026-09-08", "why": "for paid workers I'd reach for WarpBuild or similar most of the time (WarpBuild still runs my deploys/iOS builds)", "why_is_quote": true, "has_verdict": false, "sentiment": {"recommend": 4, "neutral": 1, "compare": 0, "warn": 1}, "spark": [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 2, 0, 0, 1, 0], "listed": true, "loved": [], "caveat": "", "short_quote": "for paid workers I'd reach for WarpBuild or similar most of the time (WarpBuild still runs my deploys/iOS builds)", "icon": true, "domain": "warpbuild.com", "github_repo": null, "official_url": "https://www.warpbuild.com", "pricing": "", "aliases": ["WarpBuild"], "verdict": null, "praise": [{"label": "", "summary": "", "quotes": [{"id": 793869185, "item_id": 49616824, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49616824", "by": "joshstrange", "date": "2026-09-08", "stance": "recommend", "quote": "for paid workers I'd reach for WarpBuild or similar most of the time (WarpBuild still runs my deploys/iOS builds)", "excerpt": "I'm sure my scale is many magnitudes smaller but as a solo developer/founder I ran into this same issue recently as I've been creating more PRs than normal and also increasing my GH Actions usage for things like LLM review and just more unit/e2e/etc tests. Last month I ran up $45 of overage spending (yes, I know, I know, this is tiny but for me it's not) and decided to make use of my homelab that was effectively twid", "context": "solo developer/founder", "use_case": "deploys and iOS builds", "switched_from": "", "story": "Our GitHub Actions bill kept climbing, so we moved CI to one box"}, {"id": 775654448, "item_id": 48478403, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48478403", "by": "zamalek", "date": "2026-06-10", "stance": "recommend", "quote": "We're on Warp build (50% cheaper instead of 33%) with 6 people hitting it pretty hard across a few repos and only reach $150/mo.", "excerpt": "$1000 in a month? What on earth are you doing in CI? We're on Warp build (50% cheaper instead of 33%) with 6 people hitting it pretty hard across a few repos and only reach $150/mo. That's with building rust - a worse case than anything you're using for build time. 1. I'm not sure if blacksmith offers larger runners, but you if you're using them you have checked that bigger runners are worth the squeeze? A 2x runner ", "context": "6-person team", "use_case": "CI runners", "switched_from": "", "story": "Surprise Pay $1000"}, {"id": 775558353, "item_id": 48472397, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48472397", "by": "MrAlex94", "date": "2026-06-09", "stance": "recommend", "quote": "Honourable mention to WarpBuild as well, who I used before them.", "excerpt": "> This question is for us: will we keep using Blacksmith, despite them giving us an unpleasant surprise and a prickly support exchange? Well, there are other drop-in GHA runner services, so I wouldn\u2019t see why anyone would be tied into a specific provider. Namespace.so are one and my experience with their support has been incredibly positive. Great team there. Honourable mention to WarpBuild as well, who I used before", "context": "", "use_case": "GitHub Actions runners", "switched_from": "", "story": "Surprise Pay $1000"}, {"id": 767006465, "item_id": 47937904, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47937904", "by": "peterldowns", "date": "2026-04-28", "stance": "recommend", "quote": "for much faster runners", "excerpt": "Yup! Still haven't switched off of Github, but considering it at this point. If you're in my shoes, here's some tools we use that help: - https://github.com/sethvargo/ratchet for pinning external Actions/Workflows to specific commit hashes - https://www.warpbuild.com/ for much faster runners (also: runs-on/namespace/buildjet/blacksmith/depot/... take your pick) - soon moving to Buildkite for orchestration of our CI j", "context": "", "use_case": "faster CI runners", "switched_from": "", "story": "GitHub Actions is the weakest link"}]}], "caveats": [{"label": "", "summary": "", "quotes": [{"id": 740717424, "item_id": 46294839, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46294839", "by": "phaser", "date": "2025-12-16", "stance": "warn", "quote": "these companies that are based on offering you a faster or cheaper github actions service are actually the worst of both worlds", "excerpt": "It\u2019s interesting to see the posts from warpbuild, blacksmith, buikdjet and others defending their business model that was based on the inefficiency of GitHub. I love the fact that git is built in such an open way that if you are worried about running in your own infrastructure you can easily deploy it (It\u2019s just like SSH!) yourself. At least for me, cheaper GitHub actions is a win because I can\u2019t justify running my o", "context": "", "use_case": "CI runners", "switched_from": "", "story": "Pricing Changes for GitHub Actions"}]}], "who": [{"by": "joshstrange", "context": "solo developer/founder", "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49616824", "date": "2026-09-08"}, {"by": "zamalek", "context": "6-person team", "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48478403", "date": "2026-06-10"}], "tags": [], "use_cases": ["ci runners", "deploys and ios builds", "github actions runners", "faster ci runners", "self-hosted runners"], "compared": [{"slug": "namespace", "name": "Namespace", "co": 2, "switched_from": 0, "switched_to": 1}, {"slug": "github-actions", "name": "GitHub Actions", "co": 4, "switched_from": 0, "switched_to": 0}, {"slug": "buildkite", "name": "Buildkite", "co": 2, "switched_from": 0, "switched_to": 0}], "makers": [], "threads": [{"url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48468370", "title": "Surprise Pay $1000", "mentions": 2}, {"url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46291156", "title": "Pricing Changes for GitHub Actions", "mentions": 2}, {"url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49612772", "title": "Our GitHub Actions bill kept climbing, so we moved CI to one box", "mentions": 1}, {"url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47933257", "title": "GitHub Actions is the weakest link", "mentions": 1}], "sentiment_by_month": {"2025-11": {}, "2025-12": {"neutral": 1, "warn": 1}, "2026-01": {}, "2026-02": {}, "2026-03": {}, "2026-04": {"recommend": 1}, "2026-05": {}, "2026-06": {"recommend": 2}, "2026-07": {}, "2026-08": {}, "2026-09": {"recommend": 1}, "2026-10": {}}, "quotes": [{"id": 793869185, "item_id": 49616824, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49616824", "by": "joshstrange", "date": "2026-09-08", "stance": "recommend", "quote": "for paid workers I'd reach for WarpBuild or similar most of the time (WarpBuild still runs my deploys/iOS builds)", "excerpt": "I'm sure my scale is many magnitudes smaller but as a solo developer/founder I ran into this same issue recently as I've been creating more PRs than normal and also increasing my GH Actions usage for things like LLM review and just more unit/e2e/etc tests. Last month I ran up $45 of overage spending (yes, I know, I know, this is tiny but for me it's not) and decided to make use of my homelab that was effectively twid", "context": "solo developer/founder", "use_case": "deploys and iOS builds", "switched_from": "", "story": "Our GitHub Actions bill kept climbing, so we moved CI to one box"}, {"id": 775654448, "item_id": 48478403, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48478403", "by": "zamalek", "date": "2026-06-10", "stance": "recommend", "quote": "We're on Warp build (50% cheaper instead of 33%) with 6 people hitting it pretty hard across a few repos and only reach $150/mo.", "excerpt": "$1000 in a month? What on earth are you doing in CI? We're on Warp build (50% cheaper instead of 33%) with 6 people hitting it pretty hard across a few repos and only reach $150/mo. That's with building rust - a worse case than anything you're using for build time. 1. I'm not sure if blacksmith offers larger runners, but you if you're using them you have checked that bigger runners are worth the squeeze? A 2x runner ", "context": "6-person team", "use_case": "CI runners", "switched_from": "", "story": "Surprise Pay $1000"}, {"id": 775558353, "item_id": 48472397, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48472397", "by": "MrAlex94", "date": "2026-06-09", "stance": "recommend", "quote": "Honourable mention to WarpBuild as well, who I used before them.", "excerpt": "> This question is for us: will we keep using Blacksmith, despite them giving us an unpleasant surprise and a prickly support exchange? Well, there are other drop-in GHA runner services, so I wouldn\u2019t see why anyone would be tied into a specific provider. Namespace.so are one and my experience with their support has been incredibly positive. Great team there. Honourable mention to WarpBuild as well, who I used before", "context": "", "use_case": "GitHub Actions runners", "switched_from": "", "story": "Surprise Pay $1000"}, {"id": 767006465, "item_id": 47937904, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47937904", "by": "peterldowns", "date": "2026-04-28", "stance": "recommend", "quote": "for much faster runners", "excerpt": "Yup! Still haven't switched off of Github, but considering it at this point. If you're in my shoes, here's some tools we use that help: - https://github.com/sethvargo/ratchet for pinning external Actions/Workflows to specific commit hashes - https://www.warpbuild.com/ for much faster runners (also: runs-on/namespace/buildjet/blacksmith/depot/... take your pick) - soon moving to Buildkite for orchestration of our CI j", "context": "", "use_case": "faster CI runners", "switched_from": "", "story": "GitHub Actions is the weakest link"}, {"id": 740717424, "item_id": 46294839, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46294839", "by": "phaser", "date": "2025-12-16", "stance": "warn", "quote": "these companies that are based on offering you a faster or cheaper github actions service are actually the worst of both worlds", "excerpt": "It\u2019s interesting to see the posts from warpbuild, blacksmith, buikdjet and others defending their business model that was based on the inefficiency of GitHub. I love the fact that git is built in such an open way that if you are worried about running in your own infrastructure you can easily deploy it (It\u2019s just like SSH!) yourself. At least for me, cheaper GitHub actions is a win because I can\u2019t justify running my o", "context": "", "use_case": "CI runners", "switched_from": "", "story": "Pricing Changes for GitHub Actions"}, {"id": 740694226, "item_id": 46293389, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46293389", "by": "peterldowns", "date": "2025-12-16", "stance": "neutral", "quote": "We use self-hosted runners (actually WarpBuild)", "excerpt": "I'm happy to see they're investing in Actions \u2014 charging for it should help make sure it continues to work. It's a huge reason Github is so valuable: having the status checks run on every PR, automatically, is great. Even though I'm more of a fan of Buildkite when it comes to configuring the workflows, I still need something to kick them off when PRs change, etc. Charging a per-workflow-minute platform fee makes a lo", "context": "", "use_case": "self-hosted runners", "switched_from": "", "story": "Pricing Changes for GitHub Actions"}]}