{"slug": "vmware", "name": "VMware", "category": "infra", "category_name": "Infrastructure and DevOps", "description": "", "recommenders": 2, "commenters": 3, "warners": 1, "score": 0.792, "rising": -0.65, "first": "2025-12-01", "latest": "2026-08-04", "why": "When I want Linux inside a VM I use VMware which is just better.", "why_is_quote": true, "has_verdict": false, "sentiment": {"recommend": 2, "neutral": 0, "compare": 0, "warn": 1}, "spark": [0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0], "listed": false, "loved": [], "caveat": "", "short_quote": "When I want Linux inside a VM I use VMware which is just better.", "icon": false, "domain": null, "github_repo": null, "official_url": "", "pricing": "", "aliases": ["VMware"], "verdict": null, "praise": [{"label": "", "summary": "", "quotes": [{"id": 780893696, "item_id": 48805856, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48805856", "by": "jeffbee", "date": "2026-07-06", "stance": "recommend", "quote": "I had a comfortable VMWare image with all my apps installed", "excerpt": "Yeah I used it as well, in fact I kept using it pretty much forever because I had a comfortable VMWare image with all my apps installed and wiping out your Windows system back to a known-good checkpoint is the only reasonable way to use Windows. Unfortunately this retro scheme fell apart after they stopped developing Intel Macs.", "context": "", "use_case": "running Windows 2000 in a VM", "switched_from": "", "story": "Run Windows 2000 on a DEC Alpha with a new es40 fork"}, {"id": 737814578, "item_id": 46113411, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46113411", "by": "Const-me", "date": "2025-12-01", "stance": "recommend", "quote": "When I want Linux inside a VM I use VMware which is just better.", "excerpt": "I find WSL 1 incredibly useful. C++ and .NET compiler toolchains, ssh and scp clients, and many other command-line Linux tools are working flawlessly for me despite the fake emulated kernel lacking some of the APIs. When I develop anything related to Linux be it embedded or servers, I use WSL1 a lot. I find WSL2 pretty much useless. When I want Linux inside a VM I use VMware which is just better. VMware has tree of s", "context": "develops embedded and server software", "use_case": "Linux virtual machines", "switched_from": "WSL 2", "story": "Isn't WSL2 just a VM?"}]}], "caveats": [{"label": "", "summary": "", "quotes": [{"id": 786703426, "item_id": 49168964, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49168964", "by": "hylaride", "date": "2026-08-04", "stance": "warn", "quote": "production containerization in those days was VMWare, which was enough of a performance hit to not be worth it", "excerpt": "At a previous job circa 2008-12, we were a sun shop and moved from spark to x86 Solaris. It screamed at sustained, high-concurrency loads and our workloads benefited from the trinity of Solaris' threading, ZFS tiered storage, and zones/containers. By the time the Intel Nehalem chips became available to use, our DB loads screamed, too. There were edge cases where the sparc chips were better, but not at the price point", "context": "", "use_case": "containerization", "switched_from": "", "story": "Windows XP 2002 for the Itanium: Unbridled rage"}]}], "who": [{"by": "Const-me", "context": "develops embedded and server software", "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46113411", "date": "2025-12-01"}], "tags": [], "use_cases": ["containerization", "running windows 2000 in a vm", "linux virtual machines"], "compared": [{"slug": "proxmox", "name": "Proxmox", "co": 4, "switched_from": 0, "switched_to": 1}, {"slug": "wsl", "name": "WSL", "co": 1, "switched_from": 1, "switched_to": 0}], "makers": [], "threads": [{"url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49162086", "title": "Windows XP 2002 for the Itanium: Unbridled rage", "mentions": 1}, {"url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794302", "title": "Run Windows 2000 on a DEC Alpha with a new es40 fork", "mentions": 1}, {"url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46039140", "title": "Isn't WSL2 just a VM?", "mentions": 1}], "sentiment_by_month": {"2025-11": {}, "2025-12": {"recommend": 1}, "2026-01": {}, "2026-02": {}, "2026-03": {}, "2026-04": {}, "2026-05": {}, "2026-06": {}, "2026-07": {"recommend": 1}, "2026-08": {"warn": 1}, "2026-09": {}, "2026-10": {}}, "quotes": [{"id": 786703426, "item_id": 49168964, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49168964", "by": "hylaride", "date": "2026-08-04", "stance": "warn", "quote": "production containerization in those days was VMWare, which was enough of a performance hit to not be worth it", "excerpt": "At a previous job circa 2008-12, we were a sun shop and moved from spark to x86 Solaris. It screamed at sustained, high-concurrency loads and our workloads benefited from the trinity of Solaris' threading, ZFS tiered storage, and zones/containers. By the time the Intel Nehalem chips became available to use, our DB loads screamed, too. There were edge cases where the sparc chips were better, but not at the price point", "context": "", "use_case": "containerization", "switched_from": "", "story": "Windows XP 2002 for the Itanium: Unbridled rage"}, {"id": 780893696, "item_id": 48805856, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48805856", "by": "jeffbee", "date": "2026-07-06", "stance": "recommend", "quote": "I had a comfortable VMWare image with all my apps installed", "excerpt": "Yeah I used it as well, in fact I kept using it pretty much forever because I had a comfortable VMWare image with all my apps installed and wiping out your Windows system back to a known-good checkpoint is the only reasonable way to use Windows. Unfortunately this retro scheme fell apart after they stopped developing Intel Macs.", "context": "", "use_case": "running Windows 2000 in a VM", "switched_from": "", "story": "Run Windows 2000 on a DEC Alpha with a new es40 fork"}, {"id": 737814578, "item_id": 46113411, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46113411", "by": "Const-me", "date": "2025-12-01", "stance": "recommend", "quote": "When I want Linux inside a VM I use VMware which is just better.", "excerpt": "I find WSL 1 incredibly useful. C++ and .NET compiler toolchains, ssh and scp clients, and many other command-line Linux tools are working flawlessly for me despite the fake emulated kernel lacking some of the APIs. When I develop anything related to Linux be it embedded or servers, I use WSL1 a lot. I find WSL2 pretty much useless. When I want Linux inside a VM I use VMware which is just better. VMware has tree of s", "context": "develops embedded and server software", "use_case": "Linux virtual machines", "switched_from": "WSL 2", "story": "Isn't WSL2 just a VM?"}]}