{"slug": "snapraid", "name": "SnapRAID", "category": "files", "category_name": "Files, sync and backup", "description": "", "recommenders": 3, "commenters": 3, "warners": 0, "score": 2.477, "rising": -0.98, "first": "2025-11-30", "latest": "2026-01-31", "why": "I have had good experiences with SnapRAID as well.", "why_is_quote": true, "has_verdict": false, "sentiment": {"recommend": 3, "neutral": 0, "compare": 0, "warn": 0}, "spark": [1, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], "listed": true, "loved": [], "caveat": "", "short_quote": "I have had good experiences with SnapRAID as well.", "kind": "", "icon": false, "domain": null, "github_repo": null, "official_url": "https://www.snapraid.it", "pricing": "", "aliases": ["SnapRAID"], "verdict": null, "praise": [{"label": "", "summary": "", "quotes": [{"id": 749482194, "item_id": 46842637, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46842637", "by": "imiric", "date": "2026-01-31", "version": null, "stance": "recommend", "quote": "using ext4 with SnapRAID and mergerfs for years without issues", "excerpt": "I'm currently troubleshooting an issue on my Proxmox server with very slow read speeds from a ZFS volume on an NVMe disk. The disk shows ~7GBps reads outside of ZFS, but ~10MBps in a VM using the ZFS volume. I've read other reports of this issue. It might be due to fragmentation, or misconfiguration, or who knows, really... The general consensus seems to be that performance degrades after ~80% utilization, and there ", "context": "", "use_case": "NAS parity protection", "switched_from": "", "story": "Guix System First Impressions as a Nix User"}, {"id": 743680704, "item_id": 46480044, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46480044", "by": "liampulles", "date": "2026-01-03", "version": null, "stance": "recommend", "quote": "I use SnapRAID for replication personally, because I like the flexibility it gives in terms of drives", "excerpt": "Its not a replacement for a physically seperate backup, so putting stuff in the cloud is good (though I'm sure it will get expensive, depending on how much you store). I use SnapRAID for replication personally, because I like the flexibility it gives in terms of drives that make up the array, I like that it does not work the drives too hard, I like that I can drop drives in over time (to try and lessen coinciding fai", "context": "", "use_case": "Parity-based drive redundancy", "switched_from": "", "story": "FreeBSD: Home NAS, part 1 \u2013 configuring ZFS mirror (RAID1)"}, {"id": 737588752, "item_id": 46099297, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46099297", "by": "QuiEgo", "date": "2025-11-30", "version": null, "stance": "recommend", "quote": "I have had good experiences with SnapRAID as well.", "excerpt": "I have had good experiences with SnapRAID as well. I use this script to run it (in a Chron job), which is highly configurable: https://github.com/auanasgheps/snapraid-aio-script", "context": "", "use_case": "drive redundancy", "switched_from": "", "story": "Don't throw away your old PC\u2013it makes a better NAS than anything you can buy"}, {"id": 737645537, "item_id": 46102846, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46102846", "by": "QuiEgo", "date": "2025-11-30", "version": null, "stance": "recommend", "quote": "I use mergerfs + snapraid on my HDDs for \u201ccold\u201d storage", "excerpt": "I use mergerfs + snapraid on my HDDs for \u201ccold\u201d storage for the same reason: noise. Snapraid sync and scrub runs at 4am when I am not in the same room as the NAS. The drives stay spun down 99% of the time, because I also use a ZFS mirrored pool on SSDs for \u201chot\u201d files, although Btrfs could also work if you're opposed to ZFS because it's out of tree. Basically using this idea, but with straight Debian instead of ProxM", "context": "home NAS user", "use_case": "cold storage parity", "switched_from": "", "story": "Don't throw away your old PC\u2013it makes a better NAS than anything you can buy"}]}], "caveats": [], "who": [{"by": "QuiEgo", "context": "home NAS user", "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46102846", "date": "2025-11-30"}], "tags": [], "use_cases": ["nas parity protection", "parity-based drive redundancy", "drive redundancy", "cold storage parity"], "compared": [{"slug": "mergerfs", "name": "mergerfs", "co": 2, "switched_from": 0, "switched_to": 0}, {"slug": "proxmox", "name": "Proxmox", "co": 2, "switched_from": 0, "switched_to": 0}, {"slug": "zfs", "name": "ZFS", "co": 2, "switched_from": 0, "switched_to": 0}], "makers": [], "threads": [{"url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46096781", "title": "Don't throw away your old PC\u2013it makes a better NAS than anything you can buy", "mentions": 2}, {"url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46835612", "title": "Guix System First Impressions as a Nix User", "mentions": 1}, {"url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46462108", "title": "FreeBSD: Home NAS, part 1 \u2013 configuring ZFS mirror (RAID1)", "mentions": 1}], "sentiment_by_month": {"2025-11": {"recommend": 1}, "2025-12": {}, "2026-01": {"recommend": 2}, "2026-02": {}, "2026-03": {}, "2026-04": {}, "2026-05": {}, "2026-06": {}, "2026-07": {}, "2026-08": {}, "2026-09": {}, "2026-10": {}}, "versions": [], "version_unnamed": 0, "family_ref": null, "runs_on": null, "lines": [], "quotes": [{"id": 749482194, "item_id": 46842637, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46842637", "by": "imiric", "date": "2026-01-31", "version": null, "stance": "recommend", "quote": "using ext4 with SnapRAID and mergerfs for years without issues", "excerpt": "I'm currently troubleshooting an issue on my Proxmox server with very slow read speeds from a ZFS volume on an NVMe disk. The disk shows ~7GBps reads outside of ZFS, but ~10MBps in a VM using the ZFS volume. I've read other reports of this issue. It might be due to fragmentation, or misconfiguration, or who knows, really... The general consensus seems to be that performance degrades after ~80% utilization, and there ", "context": "", "use_case": "NAS parity protection", "switched_from": "", "story": "Guix System First Impressions as a Nix User"}, {"id": 743680704, "item_id": 46480044, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46480044", "by": "liampulles", "date": "2026-01-03", "version": null, "stance": "recommend", "quote": "I use SnapRAID for replication personally, because I like the flexibility it gives in terms of drives", "excerpt": "Its not a replacement for a physically seperate backup, so putting stuff in the cloud is good (though I'm sure it will get expensive, depending on how much you store). I use SnapRAID for replication personally, because I like the flexibility it gives in terms of drives that make up the array, I like that it does not work the drives too hard, I like that I can drop drives in over time (to try and lessen coinciding fai", "context": "", "use_case": "Parity-based drive redundancy", "switched_from": "", "story": "FreeBSD: Home NAS, part 1 \u2013 configuring ZFS mirror (RAID1)"}, {"id": 737588752, "item_id": 46099297, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46099297", "by": "QuiEgo", "date": "2025-11-30", "version": null, "stance": "recommend", "quote": "I have had good experiences with SnapRAID as well.", "excerpt": "I have had good experiences with SnapRAID as well. I use this script to run it (in a Chron job), which is highly configurable: https://github.com/auanasgheps/snapraid-aio-script", "context": "", "use_case": "drive redundancy", "switched_from": "", "story": "Don't throw away your old PC\u2013it makes a better NAS than anything you can buy"}, {"id": 737645537, "item_id": 46102846, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46102846", "by": "QuiEgo", "date": "2025-11-30", "version": null, "stance": "recommend", "quote": "I use mergerfs + snapraid on my HDDs for \u201ccold\u201d storage", "excerpt": "I use mergerfs + snapraid on my HDDs for \u201ccold\u201d storage for the same reason: noise. Snapraid sync and scrub runs at 4am when I am not in the same room as the NAS. The drives stay spun down 99% of the time, because I also use a ZFS mirrored pool on SSDs for \u201chot\u201d files, although Btrfs could also work if you're opposed to ZFS because it's out of tree. Basically using this idea, but with straight Debian instead of ProxM", "context": "home NAS user", "use_case": "cold storage parity", "switched_from": "", "story": "Don't throw away your old PC\u2013it makes a better NAS than anything you can buy"}]}