{"slug": "openrsync", "name": "openrsync", "category": "terminal", "category_name": "Terminal and shell", "description": "", "recommenders": 1, "commenters": 2, "warners": 1, "score": -0.083, "rising": -0.33, "first": "2026-06-05", "latest": "2026-10-21", "why": "The smaller code base also means less bugs and vulnerabilities.", "why_is_quote": true, "has_verdict": false, "sentiment": {"recommend": 1, "neutral": 0, "compare": 0, "warn": 1}, "spark": [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0], "listed": false, "loved": [], "caveat": "", "short_quote": "The smaller code base also means less bugs and vulnerabilities.", "icon": false, "domain": null, "github_repo": null, "official_url": "", "pricing": "", "aliases": ["openrsync"], "verdict": null, "praise": [{"label": "", "summary": "", "quotes": [{"id": 774743616, "item_id": 48421476, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48421476", "by": "MYEUHD", "date": "2026-06-05", "stance": "recommend", "quote": "The smaller code base also means less bugs and vulnerabilities.", "excerpt": "I have already been using openrsync even before the recent AI drama. Just like I have been using doas for several years. All I need is `rsync -urvP` and I suspect the majority of users don't need the advanced features either. The smaller code base also means less bugs and vulnerabilities. As an example doas is ~1k lines vs 160k for sudo. That surely means a smaller attack surface. The same is true for openrsync and r", "context": "", "use_case": "file syncing", "switched_from": "rsync", "story": "Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync?"}]}], "caveats": [{"label": "", "summary": "", "quotes": [{"id": 802823473, "item_id": 50176467, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50176467", "by": "m463", "date": "2026-10-21", "stance": "warn", "quote": "they silently replaced rsync with a less capable openrsync.", "excerpt": "a lot of this stuff is already broken. XQuartz is almost unusable now since new windows don't get focus. There are a lot of bugs in xquartz marked \"macos bug\" Another issue I had is that rsync was quietly failing for a lot of stuff I backed up. I used to rsync -av machine:dir/ dir/ and it stopped syncing stuff. Turns out they silently replaced rsync with a less capable openrsync.", "context": "", "use_case": "backups", "switched_from": "rsync", "story": "macOS 15.8.2 Breaks OpenGL"}]}], "who": [], "tags": [], "use_cases": ["backups", "file syncing"], "compared": [{"slug": "rsync", "name": "rsync", "co": 2, "switched_from": 2, "switched_to": 0}], "makers": [], "threads": [{"url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50141909", "title": "macOS 15.8.2 Breaks OpenGL", "mentions": 1}, {"url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48411635", "title": "Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync?", "mentions": 1}], "sentiment_by_month": {"2025-11": {}, "2025-12": {}, "2026-01": {}, "2026-02": {}, "2026-03": {}, "2026-04": {}, "2026-05": {}, "2026-06": {"recommend": 1}, "2026-07": {}, "2026-08": {}, "2026-09": {}, "2026-10": {"warn": 1}}, "quotes": [{"id": 802823473, "item_id": 50176467, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50176467", "by": "m463", "date": "2026-10-21", "stance": "warn", "quote": "they silently replaced rsync with a less capable openrsync.", "excerpt": "a lot of this stuff is already broken. XQuartz is almost unusable now since new windows don't get focus. There are a lot of bugs in xquartz marked \"macos bug\" Another issue I had is that rsync was quietly failing for a lot of stuff I backed up. I used to rsync -av machine:dir/ dir/ and it stopped syncing stuff. Turns out they silently replaced rsync with a less capable openrsync.", "context": "", "use_case": "backups", "switched_from": "rsync", "story": "macOS 15.8.2 Breaks OpenGL"}, {"id": 774743616, "item_id": 48421476, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48421476", "by": "MYEUHD", "date": "2026-06-05", "stance": "recommend", "quote": "The smaller code base also means less bugs and vulnerabilities.", "excerpt": "I have already been using openrsync even before the recent AI drama. Just like I have been using doas for several years. All I need is `rsync -urvP` and I suspect the majority of users don't need the advanced features either. The smaller code base also means less bugs and vulnerabilities. As an example doas is ~1k lines vs 160k for sudo. That surely means a smaller attack surface. The same is true for openrsync and r", "context": "", "use_case": "file syncing", "switched_from": "rsync", "story": "Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync?"}]}