{"slug": "azure-devops", "name": "Azure DevOps", "category": "git", "category_name": "Git and code hosting", "description": "", "recommenders": 4, "commenters": 7, "warners": 1, "score": 3.299, "rising": 1.35, "first": "2026-01-07", "latest": "2026-10-12", "why": "But we have no issues whatsoever with Azure Devops....ever. It's excellent.", "why_is_quote": true, "has_verdict": false, "sentiment": {"recommend": 4, "neutral": 2, "compare": 0, "warn": 1}, "spark": [0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1], "listed": true, "loved": [], "caveat": "", "short_quote": "But we have no issues whatsoever with Azure Devops....ever. It's excellent.", "icon": true, "domain": null, "github_repo": null, "official_url": "https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/devops", "pricing": "", "aliases": ["Azure DevOps"], "verdict": null, "praise": [{"label": "", "summary": "", "quotes": [{"id": 800956400, "item_id": 50059775, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50059775", "by": "jack_sunsetless", "date": "2026-10-12", "stance": "recommend", "quote": "ADO was reliable and easy to use", "excerpt": "My company moved from Azure DevOps to GitHub because of the AI features. ADO was reliable and easy to use, and GitHub has been neither for us. Now Microsoft is adding AI to ADO too, so the main reason for the move is going away :) ADO is much better in my opinion", "context": "employee at a company that migrated to GitHub", "use_case": "source hosting and CI", "switched_from": "", "story": "Incident with Actions, Pull Requests and Issues"}, {"id": 789366288, "item_id": 49335393, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49335393", "by": "tmvnty", "date": "2026-08-17", "stance": "recommend", "quote": "Today, GitHub went down, but our repos (including PRs, CIs) worked as normal on Azure DevOps", "excerpt": "Maybe the big cloud\u2019s git solutions? Not to say the are good alternatives, but for teams already on the clouds, they could be a easier migration with somewhat feature complete, uptime, security promises that execs are looking for. At work, we have repos on GitHub and Azure DevOps. Today, GitHub went down, but our repos (including PRs, CIs) worked as normal on Azure DevOps", "context": "", "use_case": "repos, PRs, CI", "switched_from": "", "story": "Ask HN: Alternatives to GitHub"}, {"id": 773820656, "item_id": 48363791, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48363791", "by": "tobinfekkes", "date": "2026-06-01", "stance": "recommend", "quote": "But we have no issues whatsoever with Azure Devops....ever. It's excellent.", "excerpt": "I use Github extensively for my personal company, but I also use Azure DevOps (and all git-related features) extensively for a client's project. I keep seeing the Github issues being attributed to their move to Azure backend for \"scale\". But we have no issues whatsoever with Azure Devops....ever. It's excellent. Seriously. Does anyone know why the experience between Github and DevOps is so different, if they're suppo", "context": "uses GitHub for own company and Azure DevOps for a client", "use_case": "client project git hosting and CI", "switched_from": "", "story": "GitHub and the Crime Against Software"}, {"id": 744424112, "item_id": 46526507, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46526507", "by": "mindcrash", "date": "2026-01-07", "stance": "recommend", "quote": "We did this succesfully in Azure DevOps and GitLab, for example.", "excerpt": "We used to track and plan this ahead in a shared weekly schedule, together with feature work and assignments. Any good (agile) collaboration system supports this. We did this succesfully in Azure DevOps and GitLab, for example.", "context": "small team", "use_case": "recurring task planning", "switched_from": "", "story": "Ask HN: How do small teams make sure recurring tasks don't slip?"}]}], "caveats": [{"label": "", "summary": "", "quotes": [{"id": 785894818, "item_id": 49118426, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49118426", "by": "annzabelle", "date": "2026-07-30", "stance": "warn", "quote": "My team uses Azure DevOps for our git forge, which is somehow a completely different product than GitHub.", "excerpt": "I thought Google was a mess until I started working at a Microsoft shop for the first time. Boy it's astonishing. I've got two versions of Outlook on my computer, neither of which is as quick to load as Thunderbird was 20 years ago. My team uses Azure DevOps for our git forge, which is somehow a completely different product than GitHub. There are multiple versions of Planner in Teams, where the free version's feature", "context": "works at a Microsoft shop", "use_case": "git forge", "switched_from": "", "story": "Gemini Robotics 2 brings whole body intelligence to robots"}]}], "who": [{"by": "jack_sunsetless", "context": "employee at a company that migrated to GitHub", "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50059775", "date": "2026-10-12"}, {"by": "anee769", "context": "uses it at their company", "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48748351", "date": "2026-07-01"}, {"by": "tobinfekkes", "context": "uses GitHub for own company and Azure DevOps for a client", "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48363791", "date": "2026-06-01"}, {"by": "mindcrash", "context": "small team", "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46526507", "date": "2026-01-07"}], "tags": [], "use_cases": ["source hosting and ci", "repos, prs, ci", "bug and story tracking", "git forge", "source control and prs", "client project git hosting and ci"], "compared": [{"slug": "github", "name": "GitHub", "co": 4, "switched_from": 0, "switched_to": 1}], "makers": [], "threads": [{"url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50055375", "title": "Incident with Actions, Pull Requests and Issues", "mentions": 1}, {"url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49331033", "title": "Ask HN: Alternatives to GitHub", "mentions": 1}, {"url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49307099", "title": "AI Driven Testing", "mentions": 1}, {"url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49111237", "title": "Gemini Robotics 2 brings whole body intelligence to robots", "mentions": 1}, {"url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48746066", "title": "Show HN: Ox \u2013 an AI agent that catches tech debt before it's committed", "mentions": 1}, {"url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48361064", "title": "GitHub and the Crime Against Software", "mentions": 1}], "sentiment_by_month": {"2025-11": {}, "2025-12": {}, "2026-01": {"recommend": 1}, "2026-02": {}, "2026-03": {}, "2026-04": {}, "2026-05": {}, "2026-06": {"recommend": 1}, "2026-07": {"neutral": 1, "warn": 1}, "2026-08": {"neutral": 1, "recommend": 1}, "2026-09": {}, "2026-10": {"recommend": 1}}, "quotes": [{"id": 800956400, "item_id": 50059775, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50059775", "by": "jack_sunsetless", "date": "2026-10-12", "stance": "recommend", "quote": "ADO was reliable and easy to use", "excerpt": "My company moved from Azure DevOps to GitHub because of the AI features. ADO was reliable and easy to use, and GitHub has been neither for us. Now Microsoft is adding AI to ADO too, so the main reason for the move is going away :) ADO is much better in my opinion", "context": "employee at a company that migrated to GitHub", "use_case": "source hosting and CI", "switched_from": "", "story": "Incident with Actions, Pull Requests and Issues"}, {"id": 789366288, "item_id": 49335393, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49335393", "by": "tmvnty", "date": "2026-08-17", "stance": "recommend", "quote": "Today, GitHub went down, but our repos (including PRs, CIs) worked as normal on Azure DevOps", "excerpt": "Maybe the big cloud\u2019s git solutions? Not to say the are good alternatives, but for teams already on the clouds, they could be a easier migration with somewhat feature complete, uptime, security promises that execs are looking for. At work, we have repos on GitHub and Azure DevOps. Today, GitHub went down, but our repos (including PRs, CIs) worked as normal on Azure DevOps", "context": "", "use_case": "repos, PRs, CI", "switched_from": "", "story": "Ask HN: Alternatives to GitHub"}, {"id": 788919346, "item_id": 49307459, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49307459", "by": "alightsoul", "date": "2026-08-14", "stance": "neutral", "quote": "reports bugs and test results via mcp servers and rest apis to azure devops", "excerpt": "at work, an airline via an outsourcing company, the entire qa workflow is automated. we use claude desktop, the ai picks up a user story from azure devops via rest api or mcp, tests it on the app with playwright or claude browser, then reports bugs and test results via mcp servers and rest apis to azure devops. alas it needs manual intervention between each of those steps to copy and paste or publish results or comme", "context": "", "use_case": "bug and story tracking", "switched_from": "", "story": "AI Driven Testing"}, {"id": 785894818, "item_id": 49118426, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49118426", "by": "annzabelle", "date": "2026-07-30", "stance": "warn", "quote": "My team uses Azure DevOps for our git forge, which is somehow a completely different product than GitHub.", "excerpt": "I thought Google was a mess until I started working at a Microsoft shop for the first time. Boy it's astonishing. I've got two versions of Outlook on my computer, neither of which is as quick to load as Thunderbird was 20 years ago. My team uses Azure DevOps for our git forge, which is somehow a completely different product than GitHub. There are multiple versions of Planner in Teams, where the free version's feature", "context": "works at a Microsoft shop", "use_case": "git forge", "switched_from": "", "story": "Gemini Robotics 2 brings whole body intelligence to robots"}, {"id": 779973617, "item_id": 48748351, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48748351", "by": "anee769", "date": "2026-07-01", "stance": "neutral", "quote": "we use CodeRabbit with Azure DevOps", "excerpt": "The hardest part of review tools like this is signal-to-noise \u2014 one round of false positives and people start reflex-accepting or muting it. How does Ox decide what's worth flagging on a given PR, and does it dedupe against pre-existing debt so it only surfaces what the change actually introduced? In my company, we use CodeRabbit with Azure DevOps and it flags a lot of things and mostly they were false positives so e", "context": "uses it at their company", "use_case": "source control and PRs", "switched_from": "", "story": "Show HN: Ox \u2013 an AI agent that catches tech debt before it's committed"}, {"id": 773820656, "item_id": 48363791, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48363791", "by": "tobinfekkes", "date": "2026-06-01", "stance": "recommend", "quote": "But we have no issues whatsoever with Azure Devops....ever. It's excellent.", "excerpt": "I use Github extensively for my personal company, but I also use Azure DevOps (and all git-related features) extensively for a client's project. I keep seeing the Github issues being attributed to their move to Azure backend for \"scale\". But we have no issues whatsoever with Azure Devops....ever. It's excellent. Seriously. Does anyone know why the experience between Github and DevOps is so different, if they're suppo", "context": "uses GitHub for own company and Azure DevOps for a client", "use_case": "client project git hosting and CI", "switched_from": "", "story": "GitHub and the Crime Against Software"}, {"id": 744424112, "item_id": 46526507, "url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46526507", "by": "mindcrash", "date": "2026-01-07", "stance": "recommend", "quote": "We did this succesfully in Azure DevOps and GitLab, for example.", "excerpt": "We used to track and plan this ahead in a shared weekly schedule, together with feature work and assignments. Any good (agile) collaboration system supports this. We did this succesfully in Azure DevOps and GitLab, for example.", "context": "small team", "use_case": "recurring task planning", "switched_from": "", "story": "Ask HN: How do small teams make sure recurring tasks don't slip?"}]}